Beta coming soonThe StructuralClaw beta is on its way; the free browser tools work today.Join the beta list
Beta coming soon

Retaining Wall

Cantilever retaining wall stability (overturning, sliding, bearing) plus stem/heel/toe strength design. Active, at-rest and passive pressures kept as separate soil cases.

ACI 318-19IBC 2021 §1807

ACI 318-19 §7.6.1.1 / §9.6.1.2 / §25.4.2.3 · IBC 2021 §1807 · Rankine earth pressure

What it checks

The module designs the stability and strength of a cantilever retaining wall. It evaluates overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity against service loads using a factor of safety approach. It also performs strength design for the stem, heel, and toe elements. The design method distinguishes between stability and member strength. Stability checks follow IBC 2021 §1807.2, which requires service loads with a factor of safety. Member strength checks use load combinations, either from project inputs or ASCE 7-22 §2.3.1 factors. The module does not apply load factors to stability checks to avoid double-counting. The sequence of checks begins with calculating lateral earth pressures, including active, at-rest, and passive cases. It integrates these pressures to find resultants and lever arms. It then checks global stability for overturning, sliding, and bearing. Finally, it calculates internal forces in the stem and footing to determine required reinforcement.

Inputs

What it reports

Code references

The engine cites ACI 318-19 §7.6.1.1, §9.6.1.2, and §25.4.2.3 for reinforcement and development length. It references IBC 2021 §1807 for stability checks and IBC 2021 Section 1803.5.12 item 1 for seismic lateral earth pressure requirements. The module also utilizes Rankine earth pressure theory and ASCE 7-22 §2.3.1 factors when project load combinations are not supplied.

Limits

The module does not implement the Mononobe-Okabe seismic active coefficient calculation, though the function exists for static Coulomb cases. Stability checks are not run through project load combinations to prevent double-counting with IBC 2021 §1807.2 service load factors. The passive mobilization factor is an engineering convention, not a code value. Results are engineering aids; the engineer of record is responsible for the design.

This module ships in the desktop app

StructuralClaw for Windows is in active build and not yet downloadable. Join the beta list and we will send one email when it ships.

Join the beta list